I feel like that might be strong.ģ) Couldn't other races just work on scoring points in totally unrelated ways, and not bother with that particular Round Scoring tile? I mean, sure, if it's a Final Scoring tile, then you're going to want to pick races that can compete but that tile won't be in most games. What if, instead, the Final Scoring is Satellites and Federation Buildings? Couldn't the Ambas, Ivits, and Xenos just focus on Federations and Tech Track scoring, and let the Terrans have a bunch of Gaia planets? I know those cheap Gaia planets will give the Terrans some building blocks for Federations, but I really don't think that can outstrip the power of those other 3 races to form Federations. I'm really curious to hear the perspective of someone who has played it more than I have, and with 4-player groups. I can't imagine why the Terrans would be OP if the game didn't reward late game Gaia Planets or have end game scoring for Gaia Planets. I think Terrans are still fine in other setups, but I would need to play them more to know. In lower end game scoring conditions such as points for PI/A late I often like choosing factions that benefit from moving up the science track early. In those sort of setups advance techs, points for getting to 3+ of tracks ect tend to outscore PI/A. I don't see why the Gleens or Bal'Taks can't be just as good in a setup with final/round/booster scoring for Gaia Planets. ![]() And then, I think part of the problem is that people haven't learned to leverage unrelated strengths of other factions. Itars, Nevlas, and several others are meant to be great at winning by Science.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |